🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly allowing the radical right to dictate the political agenda, according to a recent research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped radical parties by legitimising their ideas and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of News Coverage

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 articles from six national newspapers.

Berlin-based researchers noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central subjects like integration and immigration, mainstream parties increasingly adjusted their communication in response.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior participating in the study.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional groups were condemning the far right. "They still receive focus," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Normalisation Effect Across Europe

While the research was focused on the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British news outlets," said another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Political Discourse

At times, leaders have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be found across Europe, as politicians from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to France adopt the rhetoric of the far right, especially on migration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are talking about societal topics – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the radical right, despite research indicates that doing so leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered revealed that the influence of radical parties had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a co-author. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their distinct narratives, especially on subjects such as migration and assimilation, instead of constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."